Home, Asia, Europe, North America, Latin America and Caribbean, Oceania, News, Sitemap
Home / Lithuania / Your Stories
loading map..
The Your Stories section is all about you! Please take a minute to tell visitors of the ILGA website about what LGBTI life is like in reality. Please submit your personal story and share your experience!

YOUR STORIES
Share your experiences in LITHUANIA - Let others know what it’s like to be LGBTI in your country! If an experience is meaningful for you, it will probably be meaningful for someone else. On whatever topic, whether good or bad, your story is how the world knows about your country and LGBTI life. By selecting tags that mark the topic your story, others can learn from your experience.
Note this is a public forum so take care when attaching any e-mail addresses or phone numbers. Nasty people may be viewing this site as well as friends! There is no need to be registered on the website, and your story will be completely anonymous.
Let us know a bit more about your story by clicking on the following (optional):
name:
relevant to..
What does your lived experience relate to?
I currently live in..

Readers Experiences

This is what people are saying about life for LGBTI people in LITHUANIA...
sort by: [most recent] [most popular]
only show comments from people who are...
and live in and that have been tagged with..

showing stories 1-50

Lithuanian Gay League (user currently living in LITHUANIA) posted for gay lesbian transgender bisexual intersex readers on 19/09/2012
link
Homeland Union opposes same - sex partnerships


In its ambitious election programme, the conservative Lithuanian party Homeland Union promises to further strengthen the family institute. Irena Degutiene, Chairman of the Parliamentary Group of the Homeland Union and Speaker of Parliament, claimed that she will actively oppose the legalization of homosexual partnerships, which would purportedly help civilization to destroy itself and humanity.

“That is directed against the survival of the country. I cannot understand how a family could have two mothers or two fathers. There should be both a mother and a father. That is self-evident,” stated Ms. Degutiene during a meeting of the Homeland Union.

Her speech against same-sex marriage was received with applause by party members. The party considers family, which the Speaker of Parliament cannot imagine without a marriage between a man and a woman, to be the main unit of the country, which should not be destroyed: “If we legalize gay or lesbian marriages… I don’t even want to think about that.”

Ms. Degutiene was reminded of a case when before a visit to Germany she was warned not to talk about family policy, because she would not be understood. She was confused by this, as she considers it to be the duty of a country to preserve the institution of family and the state itself.

Source: www.15min.lt
add response to story
Lithuanian Gay League (user currently living in LITHUANIA) posted for transgender readers on 19/07/2012
link
Trans law proposal allows documents but not gender reassignment surgery



The Lithuanian Ministry of Justice has proposed that persons who have undergone gender reassignment surgery be issued with new identity documents upon presentation of a medical statement without the need to apply for such documents through the court. At the same time it proposes that gender reassignment surgery shall not be regulated by a separate law. Mr. Antanas Matulas, Chairman of the Committee on Health Affairs in the Lithuanian Parliament, has expressed concerns that separate regulations would legitimize “supernatural” and “immoral” surgeries in Lithuania. Meanwhile human rights advocates argue that if such proposals are put into practice, the situation of trans persons could become even worse.

Trans people face two major obstacles in Lithuania. Firstly, gender reassignment surgeries are out of the legal scope. Secondly, if a trans person undergoes gender reassignment abroad, they are refused new documents in Lithuania. To be issued with new documents they must apply through the court.
Representatives of the Lithuanian government promised to change the current practice at the recent UN Human Rights Committee’s session in Geneva, where Lithuania was under review.

To this end the Ministry of Justice has put forward a procedure allowing Civil Registry Offices to register gender reassignment upon presentation of a medical statement. Until now Civil Registry Offices have been able to issue new documents only with a court order.

“People who have applied through the court have always won such cases. In most cases, the court has also ordered compensation. The situation is awkward, as Civil Registry Offices are well aware of such practice by the court, but there is no legal basis for them to issue documents based only on a medical statement, even though they know that the court will then order them to do so,” explained Mr. Tomas Vaitkevičius, Vice Minister of Justice, in an interview with news portal Delfi.

According to Mr. Vaitkevičius, if such proposals were approved, the court would be left out of the process and gender reassignment could be registered based on a medical statement.

The Ministry of Justice has also made another proposal which it believes would meet Lithuania’s international obligations rising from the 2007 decision of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) in the case L vs. Lithuania, concerning a trans person’s right to gender reassignment surgery which Lithuania lost. The Court stated that Lithuania violated L’s right to respect of privacy. The ruling obligated the State to enact a law regulating the procedure and conditions of gender reassignment within three months from the date of the decision entering into force. Though the Civil Code stipulates a person’s right to change his/her gender, this provision must be regulated by a special law that has been missing from the Lithuanian legal scope.

The Ministry of Justice suggests fully removing the mentioned provision from the Civil Code.

“We believe the decision of the ECtHR is enforceable without the provision of the Civil Code requiring a special law. With no such law, the reason for the ECtHR’s decision would be eliminated,” explained Mr. Vaitkevičius. According to the Vice Minister, this is the way to comply with the ECtHR’s decision.

At present, the Civil Code provides that any unmarried person of full age is entitled to medical gender reassignment if medically feasible. Last year representatives of the conservative wing, Mr. Antanas Matulas, Chairman of the Committee on Health Affairs in the Parliament, and Mrs. Vida Marija Čigriejienė, a member of the Committee, made a proposal to include into the Civil Code a clause prohibiting any medical gender reassignment. Mr. Matulas seems to have remained of the same opinion and has expressed strong criticism against the proposal by the Ministry of Justice.

Mr. Matulas, a gynecologist by profession, has advised that there are countries that have developed expertise in gender reassignment surgeries, such as Thailand and Indonesia, and that surgeries can be carried out there and documents then registered in Lithuania.

“Find another treatment and if nothing else helps and you really believe that nature and God have made a mistake, save some cash, go somewhere else and let someone cut off or attach whatever you might wish. But I will never agree to such surgeries being financed at the expense of actually ill persons – those with cancer, diabetes or heart disease,” said Mr. Matulas.

The initiatives by the Ministry of Justice have also been criticized by Mr. Vytautas Valentinavičius, Board Member of the Lithuanian Gay League (LGL), who believes they will make the situation even worse.
“This proposal by the Ministry of Justice would not implement the decision of the ECtHR in the case L vs. Lithuania and would instead restrict people’s legitimate expectations and further worsen the situation of trans persons in Lithuania,” argues Mr. Valentinavičius.

According to Mr. Valentinavičiaus, the suggested amendment eliminating the second part of Article 2.27 of the Civil Code that stipulates the Government’s duty to regulate gender reassignment would put trans people or people in the process of gender reassignment in an uncertain position.

According Mr. Valentinavičius, with the absence of such a procedure, the issue of hormonal treatment would remain unsolved and such people would be forced to search for finances to undergo gender reassignment abroad.

“According to this draft law, it is only after the completion of gender reassignment process and medical treatment abroad that it will be possible to present the documented proof of gender reassignment in Lithuania, and then again only after presentation of such proof will it be possible to register gender reassignment in Lithuania and be issued with new documents. This would create a precedent in Lithuania to “implement” the ECtHR decision by worsening the actual situation – eliminating provisions that allowed people to reasonably expect proper regulation of gender reassignment,” the Board Member of LGL stated.

For the proposals by the Ministry of Justice to be enforced, they must first be approved by the Government and the Parliament.


Source: www.atviri.lt
add response to story
Lithuanian Gay League (user currently living in LITHUANIA) posted for readers on 16/07/2012
link
The UN Human Rights Committee Calls on Lithuania for More Answers, More Action


Geneva 11 July 2012. The United Nations Human Rights Committee finalized the examination of the 3rd periodic report of Lithuania, which took place on 10 and 11 July 2012 in Geneva.

Today, the Human Rights Committee acknowledged the productive and open dialogue exchanged with the State delegation of Lithuania throughout the review, but also expressed that some important questions and concerns remain. While the discussion covered a wide range of human rights related topics, it focused in depth on several key issues. These included: LGBT rights, the prevention and regulation of hate speech, freedom of expression and assembly, pre-trial detention, and secret detention sites.

The State delegation admitted that crimes of hate speech against the LGBT community in Lithuania have increased over the last several years. Currently, up to 80% of crimes of hate speech perpetrated online are targeted at the LGBT community. As such, protections based on gender identity should be included in all relevant non-discrimination and hate crime legislation. Specifically, the Committee pressed the State delegation to clarify and adopt legislation to allow transsexuals to fully complete the process of gender-reassignment. This should include surgery, as well as name and personal code changes. The Committee also repeatedly criticized legislation restricting the promotion of information the State considers detrimental to minors, specifically referring to information deemed by the State to be ‘in conflict with family values.’ The Committee suggested this legislation goes too far, and may be fueling discrimination against members of the LGBT community in Lithuania.



The Committee expressed grave concern about past demonstrations led by neo-Nazis, who openly displayed swastikas. Though the State referenced the freedom of assembly and insisted these images were merely 13th century medieval symbols, the Committee remained staunch in its disapproval of State-permitted demonstrations such as these. It reminded the delegation that the freedom of assembly and expression are not absolute rights, and must be managed by the State when they are in violation of human rights.



The Human Rights Committee questioned State policies on pre-trial detention, including whether said detention may be extended at the discretion of the prosecutor, and without the authorization of a judiciary. It criticized the State for its overwhelming reliance on pre-trial detention as a primary means of ensuring unhindered criminal proceedings, as opposed to utilizing more lenient measures such as bail or house arrest. Pre-trial detention is considered the strictest of these measures, and according to the Code of Criminal Procedure is to be used only as a last resort.



The Committee also expressed concerns about conflicting information surrounding State-affiliated secret detention sites. The Council of Europe, UN Special Rapporteurs, as well as such respected NGO’s as Amnesty International, have stated that rendition has, in fact, taken place through the State party. The State delegation of Lithuania, however, insists that it conducted a number of investigations and concluded there was insufficient evidence to proceed. On more than one occasion, the Committee urged the delegation to reopen these investigations to reconcile these discrepancies, but the State has summarily declined.
The Human Rights Committee will make its recommendations public at the end of its session, on 27 July 2012.

The broadcast of the review of Lithuania can be seen on the website of the Centre for Civil and Political Rights (CCPR Centre) and at treatybodywebcast.org.

For additional information on the review of Lithuania contact:

Lithuanian Gay League (LGL): www.lgl.lt / office@gay.lt

Human Rights Monitoring Institute (HMRI): www.hrmi.lt / hrmi@hrmi.lt

Centre for Civil and Political Rights (CCPR): www.ccprcentre.org / info@ccprcentre.org


Source: www.atviri.lt
add response to story
Lithuanian Gay League (user currently living in LITHUANIA) posted for gay lesbian transgender bisexual intersex straight readers on 05/07/2012
link
On 26 June the Parliament rejected the proposal of a legislative amendment which sought to establish harsh fines for the “organization of events contradicting social morality”. The proposal authored by MP Petras Grazulis was registered immediately after European Parliament passed a resolution condemning homophobic laws and discrimination in Europe. 9 votes were in favour and 29 against.

The amendment sought to introduce a new Article 188(21) in the Administrative Code entitled “Denigration of constitutional moral values”, stating that “the public denigration of constitutional moral values and the principles of family stipulated in the Constitution and the organization of events contradicting social morality” should be a subject to a penalty from 1000 to 3000 LTL. The proposal was a new version of the amendments submitted by Mr. Gražulis repetitively and aiming at criminalization of a very wide variety of actions and activities e.g. campaigning on human rights issues related to sexual orientation and gender identity, providing sexual health information to LGBT individuals, organization of LGBT film festivals, Pride events etc.

LGL, protesting the proposals to ban freedom of expression and assembly for LGBT people, held a public action with waiving a 30 metres long rainbow flag near the Parliament on May 18th. In July 2013 Vilnius will be host for Baltic Pride march for LGBT equality.
add response to story
Lithuanian Gay League (user currently living in LITHUANIA) posted for gay lesbian transgender bisexual intersex readers on 05/07/2012
link
Transport company warned over discrimination based on sexual orientation


The Equal Opportunities Ombudsman in Lithuania has warned a Vilnius transport company over discrimination based on sexual orientation following a complaint made by the Lithuanian Gay League (LGL).

A representative of LGL first wrote a private email to the transport company requesting to rent a bus for three hours on 17 May 2012. The company confirmed the booking later the same day, informing that the service would cost 700 litas and asking to specify the required route.

In connection with providing the requested details, the client informed the company that the bus would be used by the Lithuanian Gay League. The bus company then informed the client that the booking was on hold due to negotiations over another event on 17 May.

LGL proceeded by asking the company if a bus would be available on any other date in May, but received no reply. Eventually, the company replied by saying negotiations were still ongoing and that LGL should make enquiries with other bus companies.

The Equal Opportunities Ombudsman found that the transport company in question refused to rent a bus to the client on the grounds of sexual orientation, and thus violated the Lithuanian Equal Opportunities Act.
add response to story
Lithuanian Gay League (user currently living in LITHUANIA) posted for gay lesbian transgender bisexual intersex straight readers on 02/05/2012 +0
link
Rainbow Days 2012 – Increasing public dialogue on LGBT rights

International Day Against Homophobia and Transphobia (IDAHO) will be marked in Lithuania by a week-long celebration of Rainbow Days, organised by the Lithuanian Gay League (LGL).

Rainbow Days will be opened at a press conference at Seimas on 16 May hosted by Member of Parliament Marija Aušrinė Pavilionienė, with speakers including Ambassador of the Netherlands Kornelis Spaans and John Finkbeiner, Political-Economic Chief at the Embassy of the United States.

Activities throughout the week (15–22 May) will include seminars, cinema screenings and ‘tolerance lessons’ given by LGL volunteers at the LGBT Centre in Vilnius, where participants will have the opportunity to question stereotypes and meet and talk with people who are often discriminated against and excluded from society.

A 30-metre rainbow flag will be unfolded in Vilnius as a public action, highlighting the importance of solidarity, unity and support. Rainbow Days will close with a celebration “Rainbow Café for All” featuring various Lithuanian DJs and performers.

Events will be held in both Vilnius and Kaunas. Rainbow Days will be organised in Lithuania now for the second time, with the intention of establishing the event as an annual tradition. Rainbow Days are supported by the PROGRESS programme under the European Commission, Open Society Foundations and Amnesty International.
add response to story
Lithuanian Gay League (user currently living in LITHUANIA) posted for gay lesbian transgender bisexual intersex straight readers on 23/04/2012 +5
link
US Ambassador to Lithuania highlights LGBT-friendly policy

In a recent interview given to Lithuanian news portal 15min.lt, United States Ambassador to Lithuania Anne E. Derse discussed among other things LGBT rights in the US and in Lithuania.

She talked about the current US administration’s commitment to LGBT rights, stressing that it is a core part of the US foreign policy to promote human rights also in countries with which it has relationships: “Secretary Clinton gave a speech on December 6 where she stated very clearly that we believe LGBT rights are human rights. We believe that LGBT people have the same right as everyone else to live in safety, in security, exercise all of their human rights to not be discriminated against.”

Answering a question on whether legal partnership is part of these rights, the Ambassador stated that every country has to decide for itself on these social questions, adding however that gay people have a right like everyone else to exercise their fundamental human rights, which is a fact that no-one should question.

“Secretary Clinton, in her speech on December 6, said that when you don't understand something, when it's different and strange and maybe considered alien to traditional values, it's scary, it's frightening. But in fact homosexuality is a human reality, she said, and it exists in every country in the world. And we're talking about real people, we're talking about kids in high school who might be discovering that they're homosexual. How do they feel? Are they bullied, do they feel isolated and alone? We know in the United States that there have been hate crimes, kids have died, or committed suicide, because they feel alienated. That's simply wrong. We know how parents feel when they discover that maybe they have a homosexual child. These are real human situations. This is the reality, it's not some, excuse me for using this term, ancient Soviet notion of scary.”

The Ambassador talked about debates on these issues in the US, mentioning as an example the military’s recently repealed Don't Ask Don't Tell policy, which has proved to work despite a great deal of initial concern.

The Ambassador said she is following homophobic legislative proposals pending in the Lithuanian Parliament and that her embassy in line with the Secretary of State’s policy will work against any attempts to criminalize homosexuality, working with partners in government, in media and in NGOs.

According to the Ambassador, this year’s Freedom March organised in Vilnius to celebrate Lithuanian independence day is a positive development: “The US condemns manifestations of antisemitism or homophobia or xenophobia everywhere in the world and we applaud when people celebrate freedom and democracy.”
add response to story
Lithuanian Gay League (user currently living in LITHUANIA) posted for gay lesbian transgender bisexual intersex straight readers on 20/03/2012
link
Statement on LGBT rights read in Lithuania’s UPR session

In the final session of the United Nations Human Rights Council Universal Periodic Review (UPR) of Lithuania, held in Geneva on 16 March, a statement prepared by LGL together with COC Netherlands and ILGA-Europe was read. The statement is below and can also be watched here.

- - -

Madam Vice-President,

We would like to thank Lithuania for its positive participation in the UPR process and would like to commend Lithuania for accepting recommendations to combat discrimination against LGBT people, ensure the full respect for freedom of expression and assembly for all, and prevent and prosecute all forms of violence and harassment related to sexual orientation and gender identity.

We want to draw the Lithuanian Government’s attention to the case L v Lithuania, which Lithuania lost in the European Court of Human Rights in 2007. The ruling obliges Lithuania to pass a law regulating the procedure and conditions of gender reassignment, which Lithuania has subsequently ignored. Further, members of parliament last March registered a proposal to amend the Civil Code with a prohibition of gender reassignment surgery. We urge the Lithuanian Government to act in conformity with the commitments made during the UPR process and rulings of the European Court of Human Rights, which entail the responsibility to ensure that transgender people have access to reassignment surgeries.

In response to the recommendation on recognition of family diversity, the government stated that active discussion on the concept of family is ongoing, but it is not foreseen to equalize the rights of same sex and opposite sex couples. We are concerned about a proposed amendment to the Constitution defining the concept of family as based on a marriage between a man and a woman. We recommend that Lithuania ensures equal rights between same sex and opposite sex couples in its legislation and policies, for example by introducing the possibility of partnership registration.

Whilst the government states that there are no provisions in the Law on the Protection of Minors against the Detrimental Effect of Public Information which would allow discrimination on the grounds of sexual orientation and gender identity, we remain concerned that the law could be used to restrict freedom of expression of LGBT people. The law in itself sends outs a message to society that contributes to stigma and discrimination of LGBT people.

We are concerned over legislative initiatives that are blatantly discriminatory and unlawfully restrict the right to freedom of expression of LGBT people. We urge the Lithuanian Government to engage in constructive dialogue with experts and NGOs regarding these issues to ensure that the human rights of LGBT people are fully upheld.

Thank you Madam Vice-President.
add response to story
Lithuanian Gay League (user currently living in LITHUANIA) posted for gay lesbian transgender bisexual intersex straight readers on 20/03/2012
link
Restrictions to LGBT rights on Lithuanian Parliament’s spring agenda

On 20 March 2012 the Lithuanian Parliament adopted its spring agenda, preparing to debate on three legislative amendments openly violating LGBT rights as well as the international commitments to uphold freedom of expression and to fight discrimination.

The first amendment submitted by Petras Gražulis and accepted by the parliamentarians for consideration is a new Article 214(30) in the Administrative Code entitled “Protection of constitutional moral values”. It states that “the public denigration of constitutional moral values and the principles of family stipulated in the Constitution and the organization of events contradicting social morality” should be a subject to a penalty from 1000 to 3000 LTL. If the actions mentioned above are committed repeatedly, the fine amounts to 3000 – 6000 LTL (870 – 1740 EUR). The proposal is a new version of the amendments submitted by Mr. Gražulis repetitively and aiming at criminalization of a very wide variety of actions and activities e.g. campaigning on human rights issues related to sexual orientation and gender identity, providing sexual health information to LGBT individuals, organization of LGBT film festivals, Pride events etc.

The second proposal submitted by Antanas Matulas, Vida Marija Čigriejienė and Arimantas Dumčius is an amendment to the Civil Code aiming at the prohibition of gender reassignment surgery. At present, the Civil Code provides that an unmarried adult is entitled to undergo gender reassignment surgery if it is possible medically, while the conditions and procedure of gender reassignment are set by legislation. However, no such legislation has been passed. In 2007 Lithuania lost a case in the European Court of Human Rights concerning the right of a transsexual person to gender reassignment. The MPs who submitted the controversial legislative initiative stated that the amendment would protect Lithuania from any claims at the ECHR in the future.

Also on the agenda will be a draft amendment to the Constitution accepted by Parliament in December, stating that “the family is created by a free marriage agreement between a man and woman”. All amendments to the Constitution must be considered and approved by Parliament twice, with a three month break between each vote. The proposal will be adopted if 94 members of parliament vote in favour of the amendment at each vote session. Currently Article 38 of the Lithuanian Constitution states that family is the substance of society and the State, but there is no direct reference that family is created only through marriage.
add response to story
Lithuanian Gay League (user currently living in LITHUANIA) posted for gay lesbian transgender bisexual straight readers on 08/03/2012
link
MPs rioting at gay march back to trial

The Court of First Instance will re-hear the case of Petras Gražulis and Kazimieras Uoka, the members of the Lithuanian Parliament (Seimas) who resisted police officers at the Baltic Pride march in Vilnius two years ago.

Having heard administrative law violation cases regarding the actions of Gražulis and Uoka at the Baltic Gay Pride march, a panel of judges of the Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania has decided to return the case to the Court of First Instance to rehear the request for administrative prosecution.

The Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania heard the cases of the two members of the Seimas, Gražulis and Uoka, on the basis of administrative law violation protocols issued by police officers for crossing police barriers marked with “STOP POLICE” tape and not conforming to legitimate police demands during the Pride march in Vilnius, held by the White Bridge. Vilnius County Police Headquarters appealed the decision of the Court of First Instance to dismiss Uokas’s and Gražulis’s administrative law violation cases to the Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania.

The panel of judges of the Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania ruled that the Court of First Instance had provided a limited formal statement that the Prosecutor General had refused to initiate a pre-trial investigation regarding Gražulis and Uoka as he had not received an authorization of the competent authority to initiate criminal prosecution of the persons concerned.

The panel of judges of the Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania emphasized that the Court of First Instance was to cover the subject of initiating administrative prosecution of the members of the Seimas for one of the alleged acts that does not anticipate a penalty in the form of administrative detention. The panel of judges of the Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania stated that the Court of First Instance had applied and interpreted legal acts improperly and had not clarified all circumstances of the case, thus entering groundless judgements subject to revocation with the case being returned to the Court of First Instance for rehearing.
add response to story
Lithuanian Gay League (user currently living in LITHUANIA) posted for gay lesbian transgender bisexual straight readers on 05/03/2012
link
Lithuanian parliamentary group backs European Parliament in condemning Russia’s LGBT censorship laws

The European Parliament took a stand against Russia’s LGBT censorship laws on February 16th by adopting a resolution denouncing laws which forbid the public mention of homosexuality or gender identity to minors. The resolution, presented by five political groups, reminds Russia that it is subject to human rights agreements. The text mentions the law approved by the Legislative Assembly of St. Petersburg banning so-called propaganda of “sodomy, lesbianism, bisexuality and transgenderism and pedophilia to minors” and similar laws being proposed in other regions of Russia. Various MEPs as well as the European Parliament’s Intergroup on LGBT rights have spoken against these laws.

The Intergroup also received a reaction from Lithuanian Member of Parliament Marija Pavilionienė, head of the parliamentary group ‘For Equality’, which was established as a reaction to the homophobic behaviour of some Lithuanian parliamentarians during Baltic Pride events in Vilnius in 2010. According to a letter sent by Pavilionienė to the Intergroup on LGBT rights on February 16th, the parliamentary group ‘For Equality’ shares the anxiety of MEPs who speak out against homophobic and transphobic censorship laws in Russia, and supports efforts to oppose censorship and violation of human rights of LGBT in Russia. The group underlines the necessity of modern states to respect the principals of human rights declarations and conventions, and is concerned that such bills threaten the freedom of expression and assembly and restrict public activity of the LGBT community in Russia.
add response to story
Lithuanian Gay League (user currently living in LITHUANIA) posted for gay lesbian transgender bisexual straight readers on 02/03/2012
link
Lithuania ignores UN Human Rights Council recommendations on LGBT rights

Lithuania has responded to recommendations made by various member states of the Human Rights Council at its Universal Periodic Review of Lithuania in October 2011, dismissing the concerns raised about lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) rights in Lithuania.

According to a statement issued by Lithuania’s Ministry of Justice and approved by the Government, recommendations on the protection of sexual minorities’ rights and elimination of law provisions which discriminate on grounds of sexual orientation or gender identity have already been implemented, as in Lithuania discrimination on various grounds is prohibited by Constitution and the list of grounds provided is perceived as open, and prohibition of discrimination based on sexual orientation is specified in the Law on Equal Treatment.

LGL disagrees with the position taken by the Lithuanian Government, drawing attention to the case L v Lithuania, concerning a transsexual’s right to gender reassignment, which Lithuania lost in the European Court of Human Rights in 2007. The ruling obligated Lithuania to pass a law regulating the procedure and conditions of gender reassignment, which Lithuania has subsequently ignored. Further, Lithuanian conservative parliamentarians led by the chairman of the Committee on Health Affairs last March registered a proposal to amend the Civil Code with a prohibition of gender reassignment sur gery. Disappointed with the response to the recommendations, LGL urges the Lithuanian Government to engage in dialogue with experts and NGOs regarding gender reassignment regulations.
add response to story
Lithuanian Gay League posted for gay lesbian transgender bisexual straight readers on 23/02/2012 +5
link
Ministry of Health seeks advice from the Lithuanian Gay League


The State Child Rights Protection and Adoption Service has received a query concerning children’s psychological health. The question was passed to the Ministry of Health, which started an investigation into the matter.

On 29 December 2011, a 53-year-old inhabitant of Vilnius Mr. V. D. turned to the State Child Rights Protection and Adoption Service, under the Ministry of Social Security and Labour, with a request to explain whether a parade of naked men during daytime would be harmful to a child's health.

Having received the request, Ms. Simona Bronušienė, Deputy Head of the State Child Rights Protection and Adoption Service, took urgent measures and addressed the Ministry of Health, requesting an answer to the query.

Mr. Arvydas Gabrilavičius, Head of the General Medical Care Unit of the Ministry of Health, started an investigation and requested the Lithuanian Gay League to give a statement on the matter.

In his response to the Ministry of Health, Mr. Vladimir Simonko, Head of the Lithuanian Gay League, highlighted that Article 8 Paragraph 1 Sub-paragraph 3 of the Law on Meetings forbids to organize meetings in which participants are naked.

“Should participants of a public event breach this norm, they would be held liable in accordance with the procedures laid down in this Law, irrespective of their sex, sexual orientation or other bases,” the response of the Lithuanian Gay League to the Ministry of Health holds.

Mr. Simonko also drew the attention of the Ministry of Health to the definition of public information that has a damaging effect on the development of children set out in Article 4 Paragraph 2 of the Law on the Protection of Minors against the Detrimental Effect of Public.

“Information on a naked person per se, on his/her physiology and body composition, irrespective of his/her sex, sexual orientation, age or other bases, is not considered to be such kind of information,” the response of the Lithuanian Gay League holds. “Only information of an erotic nature (Art 4 Para 2 Sub-para 4) or information that promotes sexual relations (Art 4 Para 2 Sub-para 15), irrespective of the sex of participants in such relations, is considered to have a detrimental effect on minors,” Mr. Simonko, Head of the Lithuanian Gay League, notes in his response.
add response to story
Lithuanian Gay League (user currently living in LITHUANIA) posted for gay lesbian transgender bisexual straight readers on 23/02/2012 +5
link
LGBT rights highlighted during the Universal Periodic Review of Lithuania
2012 02 23
LGL participated on 21 February in a meeting of the Lithuanian Human Rights Coalition hosted by Ambassador David Hunt at the British Embassy. LGL presented comments and recommendations made at the Universal Periodic Review (UPR) of Lithuania regarding LGBT rights to the meeting participants, including several ambassadors to Lithuania.

The Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review held its twelfth session from 3 to 14 October 2011, during which a review of Lithuania was held. LGL in collaboration with other NGOs contributed to the preparation of documents for this session, giving an overview on the status of LGBT individuals in Lithuania in collaboration with ILGA-Europe. The Lithuanian State was questioned by the Members States of the Human Rights Council about the actions that have been undertaken to improve the human rights situation in the country and to fulfill the human rights obligations.

Considering some reports of crimes committed towards LGBT persons, Sweden asked Lithuania what measures it will take to strengthen their rights and how the law could be refined to avoid discrimination against LGBT persons, and recommended taking action in order to avoid discrimination of LGBT persons, in practice and through law. Belgium stated that new amendments to the Law on the Protection of Minors against the Detrimental Effect of Public Information made secret any information “disparaging family values” or referring to marriage other than between people of the opposite sex. Belgium also noted that intolerance towards homosexuals increased over the past years due to discriminatory legislatives initiatives. Denmark expressed concerns at Lithuania’s homophobic legislation and recent proposals in the Parliament undermining the rights of sexual minorities. It referred to Amnesty International’s recommendations in this regard. Switzerland expressed concerns at the Law on the Protection of Minors against the Detrimental Effect of Public Information and at new amendments, which are discriminatory against lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people. The Netherlands expressed concerns at legislative initiatives affecting lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender people.

The recommendations listed below enjoy the support of Lithuania:

Belgium: Refrain from adopting legislative measures which criminalise homosexual relations or breach the rights to freedom of expression and to non-discrimination of LGBT people.
Brazil: Further strengthen measures to prevent and combat discrimination and to investigate allegations of hate crimes;
USA: Develop public awareness campaigns to combat manifestations of discrimination and racism, including xenophobia, homophobia, anti-Semitism, and other forms of intolerance in order to further protect and strengthen the rights of members of minority groups, including LGBT individuals and the Roma community;
Argentina: Consider/study the possibility to take additional measures to combat discrimination against LGBT people;
Ireland: Take further steps to eliminate discrimination against people based on their sexual orientation or gender identity;
Australia: Continue to ensure that LGBT people are able to exercise their rights to freedom of expression and assembly.
Norway: Carefully consider whether the right balance is struck when the main street of Vilnius is made available for annual marches by neo-Nazis on Independence Day, whilst vulnerable groups like the LGBT society are refused to use the same venue, and are referred to less attractive locations; Develop even closer co-operation with civil society on human rights related issues
Slovenia: Refrain from legislative initiatives which may criminalize homosexual relations between consenting adults; take all necessary measures to prevent and prosecute all forms of violence and harassment related to sexual orientation and gender identity; ensure the full respect for freedom of expression and freedom of assembly for all, including LGBT people.


The following recommendations will be examined by Lithuania which will provide responses in due time, but no later than the nineteenth session of the Human Rights Council in March 2012:

Belgium: Review the Law on the Protection of Minors against the Detrimental Effect of Public Information in order to remove all possibilities that this law may be applied in such a way to stigmatize or discriminate against LGBT people or to breach their rights to freedom of assembly or expression.
Switzerland: Introduce necessary measures to ensure full respect of human rights for all, including for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender people, by reviewing the Law on the Protection of Minors against the Detrimental Effect of Public Information.
Netherlands: Take the necessary legislative measures and enact policies that recognise the diversity of families and provide same sex couples with the same rights and social security benefits as heterosexual couples.
Denmark: Take steps to ensure that legislation protects the full rights of sexual minorities.
Slovenia: Repeal any discriminatory provision in existing laws on sexual orientation and gender identity


Responses by Lithuania:

Regarding its family policy, Lithuania noted a recent ruling by the Constitutional Court which acknowledged partnership as another form of family and the current debate on how to better protect the rights of unmarried couples.

Replying to questions about the Law on the Protection of Minors against the Detrimental Effects of Public Information, Lithuania stressed that the law was adopted in order to implement the requirement of the Convention on the Rights of the Child that appropriate guidelines be developed for the protection of the child from information and material injurious to his or her well-being. As the original wording of the law evoked misgivings about its possible interpretation in a manner discriminatory against sexual minorities, the law was amended. Its current version did not classify information on homosexuality as detrimental to minors and actually protected sexual minorities by classifying as detrimental information which humiliates a person because of their sexual orientation.
To explain the attitude of the State towards sexual minorities, Lithuania stated that the Parliament rejected legislative initiatives which contained suggestions that it impose administrative sanctions for propagating homosexual relationships.
Lithuania mentioned the trend toward prosecuting hate crimes more intensively and gave the example of a recent case related to commentaries on the internet about sexual minorities.

Lithuania underlined that a major conceptual challenge was to ensure that all human rights were protected and not only the most popular of them. For example, the Law on the Protection of Minors against the Detrimental Effect of Public Information was just one example of how to reconcile competing claims relating to the protection of human rights. Lithuania was open to critical remarks with regard to the choices it made to address difficult questions.

Lithuania stated that the implementation of human rights was primarily the task of specialized ministries. However, the possibilities for civil society to get involved in law and policy making significantly increased recently with the inclusion of the principle of transparency in the legislative process. Overall, Lithuania thought that it would be a fair assessment to say that it achieved significant progress in ensuring human rights, notably in civil and political rights, which were adequately guaranteed.

On freedom of peaceful assembly, Lithuania indicated that it was guaranteed by law and the only restriction was related to the necessity of ensuring public safety. Lithuanian courts ensured that public safety was not used as a mean of unreasonable restriction of that freedom. Lithuania provided examples to back its statement, namely the 2010 Baltic gay parade, which took place in Vilnius, and a protest action by trade unions which took place in front of the Parliament.
add response to story
Lithuanian Gay League (user currently living in LITHUANIA) posted for readers on 09/01/2012 +5
link
Only 4% of Lithuanians support same-sex partnership

The market research company RAIT has conducted a poll on civil partnership among 1003 Lithuanian inhabitants aged from 15 to 74. The survey, commissioned by the Baltic News Service, was carried out in November 2011.

According to the survey, seven out of ten Lithuanians believe that civil partnership status should be made legal, but only between a man and a woman. Only 4% of the respondents agree with a legal civil partnership model that would apply to both same-sex and heterosexual couples. Respondents with higher education, with an income of over 1100 LTL and younger respondents are more likely to approve of homosexual partnership. A quarter of the respondents (25%) believe that civil partnership should not be recognized at all.

The Lithuanian Ministry of Justice in November presented a draft law on recognizing the status of cohabiting unmarried partners. However, the Ministry does not propose to include same-sex couples in the scope of this law.

Member of Parliament Ms. Pavilionienė (Social Democrat) has in turn registered a draft partnership law which would include same-sex partnership. Minister of Justice Remigijus Šimašius, however, argues that homosexual couples already have sufficient legal measures in place to protect their interests.

Some Conservative Members of Parliament do not approve of the legalization of any kind of partnership, fearing that this might in the future lead to legalization of homosexual marriage.

The Government is currently deliberating on these proposals before a final decision on partnership law is taken.

Also in November 2011, the research company GfK Custom Research Baltic conducted an internet poll of 1714 respondents on whether they would be willing or unwilling to be neighbours with different social, ethnic and other groups. 56% of the respondents are unwilling to live next door to homosexuals, while one third of respondents said “it does not matter”. 72% of the respondents expressed being uncomfortable with the idea of living next door to someone with AIDS.
add response to story
Lithuanian Gay League (user currently living in LITHUANIA) posted for gay lesbian transgender bisexual straight readers on 09/01/2012
link
Seimas aims to tie concept of family to marriage

On 21 December, the Lithuanian Parliament (Seimas) accepted a draft amendment to the Constitution which states that “the family is created by a free marriage agreement between a man and woman”, with 62 members of Seimas in favour and 8 against. The proposal will next be considered by the Committee on Legal Affairs, and is due to be presented back to Seimas for approval in spring. The Human Rights Committee also wanted to analyse the proposal, but the Seimas did not agree to this.

15min.lt reported on 21 December that, according to Vilnius University law professor Vytautas Mizaras, the planned amendment to the Constitution would make Lithuania exceptional in the European context. The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) has expressed that family relations shall not be based only on marriage, but also on shared, permanent and stable life and mutual obligations. According to Mizaras “actual family relationships are recognised as well, not only on the formal registration of marriage, or even on the registration of partnership.”

In September the Constitutional Court announced that the State Family Policy adopted in 2008 – defining families as strictly based on marriage – was contradictory to the Constitution. Currently Article 38 of the Lithuanian Constitution states that family is the substance of society and the State, but there is no direct reference that family is created only through marriage.

All amendments to the Constitution must be considered and approved by Parliament twice, with a three month break between each vote. The proposal will be adopted if 94 members of parliament vote in favour of the amendment at each vote session.
add response to story
Lithuanian Gay League (user currently living in LITHUANIA) posted for gay lesbian transgender bisexual readers on 09/01/2012
link
Partnership law proposal faces opposition


Two hens or two roosters cannot lay an egg. This idea was voiced on Wednesday (30/11/2011) at the Committee on Legal Affairs (CLA) of Seimas, where the draft Law on Partnership, drawn up by Marija Aušrinė Pavilionienė, was discussed. The CLA decided that the proposal of the Member of Parliament, according to which partnerships could be concluded by same-sex persons, possibly contradicts the Constitution.

The Department of Legal Affairs of Seimas assessed the proposal and stated that the submitted draft possibly contradicts the Constitution. According to the lawyers of Seimas, the Constitutional Court equates partnership to family, and family relations may only be formed between two heterosexual persons – a man and a woman.

'Family relations may also be established in the form of a partnership (cohabitation without registered marriage) between persons. And partnership, according to the Constitutional Court, means family relations between two heterosexual persons – between a man and a woman', states the Department of Legal Affairs in its conclusions. According to the lawyers, it needs to be considered whether the provisions of the submitted draft comply with Article 38 of the Constitution.

These statements were made on Wednesday (30/11/2011) by the CLA. The future of Ms. Pavilionienė's draft will be decided upon by Seimas, which will choose either to approve the conclusion of the Committee or to start the hearing procedure.

'Article 38 of the Constitution lays down that marriage may only be concluded in free will of a man and a woman, but it does not presuppose any prohibition as to same-sex partnerships. Therefore, I claim that my draft proposal does not contradict the Constitution of Lithuania. It simply does not correspond to the archaic attitude towards sex, and reflects a reality which fails to be accepted in Lithuania', said Ms. Pavilionienė.

'This is the first step towards marriage. I can see clear violations of the Constitution', said Vidmantas Žiemelis member of the Christian Fraction, expressing his concerns about homosexual marriages.

The proposed draft law would provide couples with the possibility to legally register their cohabitation or partnership. In accordance with the provisions of the draft law, partnership may only be concluded by persons no younger than 18 years of age, both being legally capable and free from any other partnership. Under the proposed draft, partnerships could be concluded by both hetero- and homosexuals.
add response to story
Lithuanian Gay League (user currently living in LITHUANIA) posted for gay lesbian transgender bisexual readers on 09/01/2012
link
The Minister of Justice came up with suggestion to adopt discriminatory legal partnership model in Lithuania, which would allow to protect interests of heterosexual couples only.

Draft law suggests property regime for unmarried partners very similar to the one of married couples. All property, gained while living together, would be common and would belong to each partner in equal parts, except property, which was gained separately before starting living together, was inherited or gained in other foreseen exceptional cases. In order to sell or to give common property, an agreement from other partner will be needed. Property regulation will differ from marriage in case of inheritance - partners will not be able to inherit each other’s property and will not get various allowances (e.g. widow allowance) as well as mutual support obligation will not be required.

Partnership would end when a couple, under one’s decision, will stop living together, will enter into marriage together or separately, as well as in case of partner’s death.

The Minister of Justice to protect interests of heterosexual cohabitees only


According to the Minister, this project will not be applied to regulate the relationships of the same sex couples. He truly believes, that property issues of homosexual couples in Lithuania “may be effectively solved on a base of mutual agreement, by making a contract at the notary”.
add response to story
Lithuanian Gay League (user currently living in LITHUANIA) posted for gay lesbian readers on 09/01/2012
link
Open lesbians and gays are welcome in Lithuanian army?


Can a young man serve in the Army, making no secret he is a homosexual? Such question is raised by country’s LGBT community after receiving a conclusion from the Ombudsman of Equal opportunities. Though Ministry of National Defense (MoND) claims that common principles of non-discrimination are enough and says never heard of possible discrimination based on sexual orientation, Ombudsman Aušrinė Burneikienė recommended to regulate this issue in the Soldier Code of Conduct in a more clear way.

Investigation on possible breach of Equal opportunities law was started when a complaint was received from a young woman. Law obliges institutions to assure that legal acts issued by them implement equal rights and opportunities regardless of gender, race, nationality, language, origin, social status, religion, beliefs or attitudes, age, sexual orientation or disability.

The author of the complaint had missed a clear statement about non-discrimination based on sexual orientation in the Soldier Code of Conduct. This document commits serving soldier “to respect and protect each person’s dignity and main rights and liberties, irrespective of his/her nationality or origin, social status, political, religious views”.

“In the future I purpose to become a member of voluntary army service, therefore I will also have to follow this code”, the woman stated in the complaint. “Considering that I am a homosexual and I do not conceal it in my environment, if this fact comes out, it may cause problems interacting with other soldiers. Since the Code does not raise the requirement not to restrict rights in soldiers’ interaction and not to render privileges regardless of sexual orientation (people of this group are especially exposed in the army), it means I will not have an opportunity to use the protection of the Code and so my rights and equal opportunities are violated and my position is less favorable than of other soldiers”.

Would immunity of private life protect?

MoND chancellor Leonardas Bakaitis thinks that the complaint is unreasoned, because law of Equal opportunities does not directly require including the mentioned phrase into legal acts of an institution or an agency. Purportedly, it is enough to avoid phrasings, which may become a basis for discrimination.

Sexual orientation is not mentioned in the Constitution, however, a right not to be discriminated for that is protected, as it is related to human’s personal life. According to the chancellor, legislation, regulating soldiers’ serving, protects the right for sanctity of personal life (as well as for sexual orientation).

For example, legislation for soldiers’ selection, rotation, order for honoring degrees, serving process and conditions do not foresee that sexual orientation would be considered while assigning tasks, honoring a degree or other. Rights and liberties of the soldiers are restricted only as much as the law permits and army interests require. Soldiers are not required to give information on their sexual orientation.
Army’s status foresees disciplinary responsibility for offending other soldier. Soldier Code of Conduct obliges soldiers not to perform, prompt or tolerate the behavior, humiliating human’s dignity. Their intercommunication is based on respect, trust, honesty, help, equal rights, tolerance and discretion, soldiers shall not restrict each other’s rights or provide with privileges due to gender, origin, language, social status, religion, age, beliefs or views. A soldier must avoid humiliating or offending other soldier, scandals, slander, provocation of dissension, shall behave respectfully when interacting with colleagues.

Breach was not found, though it is suggested to amend the code

Law Institute have also noticed, that law obliges institutions and agencies to assure equal opportunities (to thoroughly check if law acts follow Equal opportunities requirement and if human’s equal opportunities are not violated), but not to consolidate. In other words, agencies or institutions are asked not to repeat the law word by word, but not to breach the rights of a single human group. “Prohibition to discriminate on a base of sexual orientation is in the law of Equal opportunities, therefore its existence in law acts of weaker power does not have a discretionary juridical significance“.

Lawyers had paid attention, that soldier status and intercommunication are regulated not only according to the Code of Conduct. It also shall follow law acts of higher power: the Constitution, the law of Equal opportunities. National Defense system’s organization and military service law foresee that soldier’s dignity shall be respected, soldier shall not face humiliation, and he has a right to a protection of his personal life.

On the grounds of these explanations, A. Burneikienė stated, that Soldier Code of Conduct does not violate the law of Equal opportunities. Despite this, seeking juridical clearness and compatibility of law act regulation, she recommended to put all grounds for non-discrimination from the Constitution and the law of Equal opportunities to the Code or to foresee durative list of possible discrimination grounds.

No complaints received to date

As the head of Public Department of MoND, Jovita Buzevičiūtė, have stated to the web portal lzinios.lt, decision on corrections of the Code will be taken after getting familiar with the recommendation from the Ombudsman.

According to her, law and other law acts do not foresee sexual orientation as a ground for rejecting or discharging from military service. “The army, the same as the society in general, has the same law acts, which defends human’s inviolability, therefore the background for discharging from military service would not be the orientation itself, but illegal acts, which would make an attempt on other’s rights, e.g., sexual constraint“, said MoND representative.

Neither the ministry, nor National Defense system institutions, responsible for examining complaints, have not received the complaint to date, that a soldier would be offended because of sexual orientation (even if he had never confessed to be homosexual).
To this day, more than 7,6 thousand of professional and about 120 of mandatory basic military service soldiers and 4,3 thousand of volunteers serve in Lithuania‘s National Defense system.

Keep silent if face bullying

Lithuanian gay community leader Vladimir Simonko has not examined how many homosexuals may be serving the army; however he has no doubt, that there are gays and lesbians among the troops. “I myself have served, but this was in the Soviet period”, he said to the web portal lzinios.lt. The collocutor knows a homosexual, who served in Afghanistan.

In V. Simonko’s words, “the ombudsman sends a message for the soldiers, that law of Equal opportunities is obligatory to them and it is forbidden to discriminate on the ground of sexual orientation in the army”.

According to him, the army must have juridical clearness and definiteness, because in this sphere showing of power is quite often. “Persons, who have faced discrimination in military service, are more likable not to forgive the cases of discrimination or twit, so that there would not be negative consequences or results. That is why, more clearness and definiteness is needed in the Soldier Code of Conduct, indicating which soldier rights and interests must be protected and indefeasible”, said V. Simonko. Inappropriate behavior should include harassment (physical or verbal activities, humiliating others for their race, gender, sexual orientation, and other personal qualities).

“Is MoND ready to take effective actions, so that non-discrimination policy would be implemented practically?”, V. Simonko asked rhetorically. “We hear the minister speaking, that there is no discrimination in the army. For the meantime it sounds like a declaration, but not like an applied behavior standard. Probably, it is not yet realized, that pro-active non-discrimination policy is not a challenge to a traditional army and it will not create ungrounded confusion”.

Community leader instigated to ground non-discriminating behavior standard with regulations, significant to the protection of homosexual soldiers and discipline assurance. Such behavior, purportedly, overwhelms respect and tolerance to the others.

“Heterosexuals must be required to tolerate homosexuals, however the whole personnel, including known homosexuals, shall clearly understand, that military service is not a place for demonstrating one’s sexual orientation or expressing sexuality”, he noted.
add response to story
Lithuanian Gay League (user currently living in LITHUANIA) posted for gay lesbian transgender bisexual readers on 09/01/2012
link
LBT women send greetings to the Lithuanian MPs


In the framework of LGL’s on-going project Empowering LBT Women a group of volunteers took up an action of sending postcards to the members of the Lithuanian Parliament.

The postcards depicting representatives of LBT community have been produced within the project’s promotional campaign under the motto “Pradėkime kalbėti” (Let’s speak) which encourages to start a dialogue and thus raise the visibility of lesbians, bisexual and transgender women.

In Lithuania there is a significant absence of LBT manifestation among the society. The action is a response to this lack and aims at drawing the attention of the Lithuanian decision making authorities that LBT women do exist in Lithuania with their needs and rights that should be respected. The postcards have been sent on 5th of November to every single Member of Parliament. Delfi, a major news internet portal in Lithuania, informed about the action in its article.
add response to story
Lithuanian Gay League (user currently living in LITHUANIA) posted for gay lesbian transgender bisexual readers on 12/07/2011 tagged with human rights, sexual orientation
link
From ban to protection: sexual orientation discrimination prohibited in ads

Lithuanian Parliament responded to the call of LGL and other human rights groups to ensure that public information serves to enhance equality, tolerance and respect for human rights for all, including LGBT people and to scrap the discriminatory provision banning any manifestation of sexual orientation in TV and radio ads.

The amended Article 39 of the Law on Provision of Information now states that advertising and audiovisual commercial communication must not prejudice respect for human dignity, discrimination or fostering of discrimination on grounds of race, sex, sexual orientation or ethnic origin, nationality, citizenship, religion or faith, disability, and age, neither must itbe offensive to religious or political beliefs, encourage behaviour prejudicial to health and safety, or behaviour largely detrimental to environmental protection.

During the heated debate at the plenary session of June 16 alternative amendments proposed by Petras Gražulis, Order and Justice MP who argued for not including in the law the prohibition to discriminate because of sexual orientation, were rejected.

“I have no intention of despising any person who has any vice, whether he is an alcoholic or a drug addict or a kleptomaniac or has any other problem a person may have. That's a weak person. It’s not my right to condemn him, but to make him a hero and place him next to faith; well, I'm sorry”, Mr. Gražulis shouted from the Seimas stand as reported by www.15min.lt.
Valentinas Stundys, who proposed the amendment to the Law on the Provision of Information to the Public that would prohibit discrimination on the grounds of sexual orientation, maintained that by proposing his amendments Mr. Gražulis was led by his emotions rather than by common sense.
“Mr. Gražulis should not mislead the public and create waves of emotions, because it looks as if he failed to understand something and after noticing one word got frightened and simply started getting delirious. I reject all of his strange insinuations and encourage him to think by engaging what a man has best”, Mr. Stundys said.
A. Čaplikas of the Liberal and Centre Union seconded him and added that he was starting to suspect that there was “something wrong” with Mr. Gražulis.
“Someone fighting so hard against homosexuality presumably has issues of his own that he is afraid to confess. Well, I don’t know why, but that's just the way it seems to me. This is a normal law, European and civilised, but a storm is being created in a teacup, invoking morality, the Church, and Christianity. I’m just scared by such people. I don’t believe them”, Mr. Čaplikas said.
Some parliamentarians clearly supported Mr. Gražulis’ side. They insisted that the prohibition of discrimination would prevent the expression of any opinion about homosexuality.
“Sir, you wish to introduce the prohibition of discrimination on the grounds of sexual orientation. That’s really not the same. Sir, you are a literate person. Have you cleared your actions with your confessor? You're evidently trying to deceive us. This is the first time I've seen such a cunning colleague”, Conservative Kazimieras Uoka retorted.
He agreed with the opinion that the prohibition of discrimination against sexual minorities would open the way to their propagation.
“By removing the prohibition against encouraging manifestations of sexual orientation, you entrench in Lithuanian law the encouragement, implementation, and dissemination in the public space of sexual orientation, including sexual perversions”, Rimantas Smetona said, explaining how he understood the law would be adopted.
Mr. Stundys retorted that encouragement is prohibited by another law, the Protection of Minors against the Detrimental Effect of Public Information. Prohibitions stipulated in this law are not restricted by the amendments to the Law on the Provision of Information to the Public adopted on June 16.
add response to story
Lithuanian Gay League (user currently living in LITHUANIA) posted for gay lesbian transgender bisexual readers on 14/04/2011 tagged with gender identity, human rights, laws and leadership , sexual orientation +5
link
Lithuanian Parliament to „improve“ the ban of „gay propaganda“

13.04.2011

Today a majority of the members of the Committee on Legal Affairs of Lithuanian Parliament voted for the „improvement“ of legislative amendment which seeks to establish harsh fines for the „propagation of homosexual relations in the public“. The author of the anti-gay law, MP Petras Grazulis now has unlimited time to come up with a new amended proposal which has to go under considerations in the parliamentary committees once again.

Vladimir Simonko, Chair of the national LGBT advocacy association LGL, reacted: „This is a one more warning act of institutionalised homophobia which prevails among Lithuanian lawmakers. Such kind of legislative proposals are totally unacceptable in the context of the legally binding Charter of Fundamental Rights which clearly prohibits any discrimination on the ground of sexual orientation. We urge European Commission as the guardian of the Lisbon Treaty to intervene immediately“.

Yesterday a group of Lithuanian parliamentarians has appealed to the heads of the Lithuanian Catholic, Russian Orthodox, Evangelical Lutheran Churches, and other confessions asking them to publicly encourage parliamentarians to approve the draft law currently being discussed in the Seimas regarding the establishment of administrative liability for “propagating homosexual relationships”.

According to the parliamentarians, the provisions of the draft law are in compliance with the overall position expressed by the heads of the Lithuanian Catholic, Russian Orthodox, and Evangelical Lutheran Churches.
add response to story
Bookmark and Share