Home, Asia, Europe, North America, Latin America and Caribbean, Oceania, News, Sitemap
EN


Home / Asia / Philippines / Articles / Philippine Supreme Court Orders the Commission on Elections to Include Ang Ladlad (LGBT Party List Group) in the 2010 Elections
loading map..

Contributors

anonymous contributorWritten anonymously. (English)

Facebook

Danton Remoto Ang Ladlad president and nominee
Philippine Supreme Court Orders the Commission on Elections to Include Ang Ladlad (LGBT Party List Group) in the 2010 Elections

in PHILIPPINES, 13/01/2010

MANILA, Philippines—The Supreme Court ordered the Commission on Elections (Comelec) Tuesday to recognize the gay group Ang Ladlad as an accredited party-list group and to include its name when the poll body starts printing the ballots for the May 2010 elections. The directive was contained in a temporary restraining order issued by the court against a Comelec resolution disqualifying Ang Ladlad from the party-list elections in May.

Supreme Court orders Comelec to count Ladlad in 2010 polls

By Norman Bordadora
Philippine Daily Inquirer
With a report from Kristine L. Alave
First Posted 17:33:00 01/12/2010

The Supreme Court on Tuesday restrained the Commission on Elections (Comelec) from enforcing its resolution disqualifying the gay group “Ang Ladlad” from the party-list elections in May.

In an en banc session, the court issued a temporary restraining order (TRO) directing the Comelec to continue recognizing Ang Ladlad as an accredited party-list group and include its name on the ballots, pending a final court ruling on Ang Ladlad’s appeal against the poll body’s disqualification order.

Deputy Court Administrator Jose Midas Marquez told reporters that Ang Ladlad’s appeal remained pending in the high court.
Marquez said the court was aware of the time constraints on the Comelec to print the names of eligible candidates and party-list groups on the ballots for the precinct count optical scan system.

“If, later on, the Court finds that Ang Ladlad should be qualified, it might be difficult, if not impossible, to include them on the ballots,” Marquez said.
 

‘We’re unstoppable’

Danton Remoto, Ang Ladlad president and nominee, hailed the Supreme Court ruling. “We are the first gay and lesbian party in the world ... nothing can stop us now,” Remoto said in a phone interview. “Our arguments were well-written and were based on the law.”  Remoto said the court order for Ang Ladlad’s inclusion on the ballot proved that the Comelec’s decision, which had quoted passages from the Bible and the Koran to support its position, was wrong.

In a 26-page petition for certiorari filed on Jan. 4, Ang Ladlad asked the court to nullify the Comelec resolution and compel the commission to add the name of the gay group when ballots are printed starting on January 25.

“A cursory perusal of the Comelec thesis reveals that the commission equated Ang Ladlad’s tolerance of the beliefs of those ‘differently oriented’ with the petitioner-applicant’s purported acts or practice of immorality,” the group said in its petition.
Ang Ladlad said the Comelec invoked Article 201 of the Revised Penal Code dealing with the glorification of criminals, violence in shows, obscene publications and lustful or pornographic exhibitions to back its conclusion that the group was espousing doctrines contrary to public morals.

Carried to the extreme

“It may not be amiss to say … that homosexuality per se does not fall within the ambit of the penal law. That one’s affections toward people of the same sex easily translate to lust and immorality is obviously a nonsequitur,” the group added.
Carried to the extreme, equating homosexuality with immorality or criminality would make calling another person “bading” (effeminate gay) or “tibo” (butch lesbian) a ground for criminal action, Ang Ladlad told the court.

It said the Comelec commissioner who said there were already many homosexuals in Congress “may be exposed to charges of slander by the offended members of Congress whom he forced ‘out of the closet,’ because simply branding them as gays would then possibly constitute as a malicious imputation of a crime, vice or defect.”

 

 
Bookmark and Share